From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26398 invoked by alias); 5 Jan 2007 04:06:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 26390 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Jan 2007 04:06:39 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nile.gnat.com (HELO nile.gnat.com) (205.232.38.5) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Jan 2007 04:06:28 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F58248CCC1 for ; Thu, 4 Jan 2007 23:06:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from nile.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nile.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 25918-02-4 for ; Thu, 4 Jan 2007 23:06:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from takamaka.act-europe.fr (AStDenis-105-1-31-133.w80-8.abo.wanadoo.fr [80.8.132.133]) by nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EDE748CC35 for ; Thu, 4 Jan 2007 23:06:25 -0500 (EST) Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7078534C099; Fri, 5 Jan 2007 08:07:13 +0400 (RET) Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2007 04:06:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: New Ada failure Message-ID: <20070105040713.GC3434@adacore.com> References: <20070104202406.GA26522@nevyn.them.org> <20070105035647.GB3434@adacore.com> <20070105035904.GA9926@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070105035904.GA9926@nevyn.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-01/txt/msg00092.txt.bz2 > > I am not sure why you stripped your libgnat.so. From your other messages, > > it sounds like something that you must do. At least with GNAT Pro, > > the runtime is built at -O2 and without -g, except for a few select units > > which are deliberately built with -g (and often -O1 instead of -O2). > > To us, if you strip the runtime, then you break the compiler-debugger > > interface. > > > > Would you consider not stripping libgnat.so? > > Not up to me - I have Debian's gnat packages installed. Is this > documented, i.e. it should be considered a bug in those packages? As far as I am concerned, I think it should be considered a bug. However, I am not sure it is documented. Is there a speciic place where it should be documented? Perhaps in the INSTALL or README of GCC? I'll ask around at AdaCore. -- Joel