From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32135 invoked by alias); 2 Jan 2007 19:31:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 32127 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Jan 2007 19:31:02 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Jan 2007 19:30:52 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H1pLV-000595-KW; Tue, 02 Jan 2007 14:30:49 -0500 Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2007 19:31:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Jim Blandy Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: gdb very slow during 'step into' Message-ID: <20070102193049.GA19762@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Jim Blandy , gdb@sourceware.org References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-01/txt/msg00021.txt.bz2 On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 11:30:16AM -0800, Jim Blandy wrote: > If you set the environment variable LD_BIND_NOW to a non-empty value > before running your program (use GDB's 'set env' command), does that > eliminate the slow steps? Is this where we step through the dynamic linker? We really should avoid that... -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery