From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32370 invoked by alias); 1 Jan 2007 16:34:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 32357 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Jan 2007 16:34:10 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Jan 2007 16:34:05 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H1Q6p-0003cL-Cb; Mon, 01 Jan 2007 11:33:59 -0500 Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2007 16:34:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Mark Kettenis Cc: John David Anglin , gdb@sourceware.org, dave.anglin@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca, brobecker@adacore.com Subject: Re: Likely obsolete pieces of GDB Message-ID: <20070101163359.GB13802@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Mark Kettenis , John David Anglin , gdb@sourceware.org, dave.anglin@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca, brobecker@adacore.com References: <200612170123.kBH1NfVF025104@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca> <23697.82.92.89.47.1166355987.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <23697.82.92.89.47.1166355987.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-01/txt/msg00001.txt.bz2 On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 12:46:27PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > > hppa*-*-hiux* > > > > Definitely obsolete. > > However, there is no real benefit in dropping this, since the configuration > is identical to hppa*-*-hpux*. True. No benefit in keeping it, either. > > > vax-*-* > > > > > > (But not NetBSD or OpenBSD) > > > > Ultrix still might work but I doubt anybody other than myself still > > has such a machine running. There still some interest in linux. > > I lost my SIMH Ultrix image to a disk crash a while ago. However, I'm > somewhat attached to vax-nat.c, since it is the best example of the > way the traditional UNIX ptrace() worked. I'll take this as a reason to leave the vax-ultrix target, for now. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery