From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7270 invoked by alias); 26 Dec 2006 20:27:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 7253 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Dec 2006 20:27:12 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from zigzag.lvk.cs.msu.su (HELO zigzag.lvk.cs.msu.su) (158.250.17.23) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Dec 2006 20:27:08 +0000 Received: from Debian-exim by zigzag.lvk.cs.msu.su with spam-scanned (Exim 4.50) id 1GzIt7-0002TG-4C for gdb@sources.redhat.com; Tue, 26 Dec 2006 23:27:05 +0300 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ip6-localhost) by zigzag.lvk.cs.msu.su with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50) id 1GzIsz-0002RS-3b; Tue, 26 Dec 2006 23:26:57 +0300 From: Vladimir Prus To: Bob Rossi Subject: Re: step into next source line (that belongs to me) Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 20:27:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <200612261319.02937.trapni@gentoo.org> <20061226202241.GF8037@cox.net> In-Reply-To: <20061226202241.GF8037@cox.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200612262326.24480.ghost@cs.msu.su> Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-12/txt/msg00210.txt.bz2 On Tuesday 26 December 2006 23:22, Bob Rossi wrote: > On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 11:20:41PM +0300, Vladimir Prus wrote: > > Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 01:19:00PM +0100, Christian Parpart wrote: > > >> Is there a way to do such things using gdb? > > > > > > Not yet, no. But it could probably be added using your definition of > > > interesting files. > > > > FWIW, it is not obvious this should be in GDB. The frontend might be > > in a better position to conveniently specify which files to ignore, > > and all that's needed is emitting "finish + step" when > > entering "non-interesting" function. I planned to implement > > some "auto-finish" functionality in KDevelop for quite some time. > > Well, the CLI is considered to be a front end, IMO. Ok, then correction: "The frontend" above should be replaced with "A GUI frontend". - Volodya