Re: Likely obsolete pieces of GDB

Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-02-10T20:50:10Z

On Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 11:46:22AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> That leaves the items below. I propose that, when we've agreed on this
> list, we (A) send the list to gdb-announce, (B) wait a few weeks for
> feedback, and then (C) delete the files. At the same time, for removed
> configurations we can add a blurb in configure which recognizes the
> removed configurations and informs the user that support was removed.
>
> That's a pretty aggressive removal schedule, I realize. If folks are
> uncomfortable with it, speak up, and we can come up with something
> slower. But I don't want to invest too much time in issuing warnings
> for code that we're pretty sure no one uses any more.

No one spoke up. Let's do it. I'll take care of the actual removals.

Joel, gdb-announce is moderated, right? If I sent you the current list
could you post it there?

--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery