From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
To: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>,
gdb@sourceware.org, dave.anglin@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca,
Mark Kettenis <kettenis@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Likely obsolete pieces of GDB
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 06:01:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061220060233.GA27642@adacore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061217153726.GB16423@nevyn.them.org>
> I am happy to change the mechanism; I don't like // OBSOLETE either.
> We can't even use the current mechanism for some of these files:
> anything not directly corresponding to a target.
>
> To be honest, I'd been thinking about waiting for everyone to agree on
> which things to remove, sending a message to gdb-announce, and then
> just doing it. If there were any justifiable complaints at the time of
> the next release we could recover targets from CVS history. I'm sure
> not everyone is comfortable with that sudden of an approach, so
> using configure for targets for one release is fine with me too.
Either approach is fine with me. I agree the // OBSOLETE approach
is a bit of a pain...
--
Joel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-20 6:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-16 20:59 Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-12-16 21:23 ` Christopher Faylor
2007-02-10 21:42 ` Pedro Alves
2007-02-10 23:50 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-02-19 1:25 ` Pedro Alves
2006-12-17 1:24 ` John David Anglin
2006-12-17 11:46 ` Mark Kettenis
2007-01-01 16:34 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-12-18 3:03 ` John David Anglin
2006-12-18 3:43 ` John David Anglin
2006-12-20 16:07 ` John David Anglin
2006-12-20 17:41 ` John David Anglin
2007-01-01 16:33 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-01-01 16:47 ` John David Anglin
2007-01-01 17:10 ` Mark Kettenis
2007-01-01 17:20 ` John David Anglin
2006-12-17 1:36 ` Russell Shaw
2006-12-17 12:20 ` Mark Kettenis
2006-12-17 14:26 ` Stephen & Linda Smith
2006-12-17 15:37 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-12-20 6:01 ` Joel Brobecker [this message]
2006-12-17 13:40 ` Joel Brobecker
2007-01-01 16:46 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-01-01 16:58 ` Mark Kettenis
2007-01-03 23:55 ` Jim Blandy
2007-02-10 20:50 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-02-12 17:35 ` Joel Brobecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061220060233.GA27642@adacore.com \
--to=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=dave.anglin@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
--cc=kettenis@gnu.org \
--cc=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox