From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20653 invoked by alias); 6 Dec 2006 17:48:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 20644 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Dec 2006 17:48:25 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nile.gnat.com (HELO nile.gnat.com) (205.232.38.5) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Dec 2006 17:48:13 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 515C048D12A; Wed, 6 Dec 2006 12:18:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from nile.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nile.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 28009-01-5; Wed, 6 Dec 2006 12:18:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from takamaka.act-europe.fr (unknown [70.71.0.212]) by nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D11948CBF2; Wed, 6 Dec 2006 12:18:07 -0500 (EST) Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B8E9734C099; Wed, 6 Dec 2006 09:18:36 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2006 17:48:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Markus Deuling Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: GDB 6.5.90 available for testing (GDB 6.6 pre-release) Message-ID: <20061206171836.GB10819@adacore.com> References: <20061202192351.GY3304@adacore.com> <45752271.2080501@de.ibm.com> <20061205185645.GT15038@adacore.com> <4576B13F.7030305@de.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4576B13F.7030305@de.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-12/txt/msg00054.txt.bz2 > >>Results: > >>http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-testers/2006-q4/msg00024.html > > > >Did you compare that with the results obtained with GDB 6.5? > >That would be an interesting datapoint. > > > > I compared it with vanilla GDB 6.5 on powerpc with nearly the same results: > > http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-testers/2006-q4/msg00025.html Thanks. It looks like there has not been any degradation in the quality of that port, which is good. If you have some time in the future, perhaps you can help fixing the issues that the testsuite is revealing and improve the next release? ;-) -- Joel