From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-27060-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 24946 invoked by alias); 5 Dec 2006 20:35:26 -0000
Received: (qmail 24938 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Dec 2006 20:35:26 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from smtp108.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com (HELO smtp108.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (68.142.198.207)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with SMTP; Tue, 05 Dec 2006 20:35:19 +0000
Received: (qmail 64745 invoked from network); 5 Dec 2006 20:35:17 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lucon.org) (hjjean@sbcglobal.net@71.146.122.56 with login)   by smtp108.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 5 Dec 2006 20:35:17 -0000
X-YMail-OSG: tKSM01sVM1naCEwX1map1XEacXRoreDQ6EmtC8rUv97wcCqlm7DAY0iv2jiQ_NrJKz49gwqML7kOFl9sZeRLLAhzug4tPvC46S2GJ_u769R2Pi3Rbu0z
Received: by lucon.org (Postfix, from userid 500) 	id 26DDB46EEEB; Tue,  5 Dec 2006 12:35:16 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2006 20:35:00 -0000
From: "H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>
To: Jim Blandy <jimb@codesourcery.com>
Cc: Markus Deuling <deuling@de.ibm.com>, 	Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>, gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: GDB 6.5.90 available for testing (GDB 6.6 pre-release)
Message-ID: <20061205203516.GA30315@lucon.org>
References: <20061202192351.GY3304@adacore.com> <4573EBCD.90505@de.ibm.com> <20061204182108.GA11343@adacore.com> <4575197F.7020602@de.ibm.com> <m3lklm2m2s.fsf@codesourcery.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <m3lklm2m2s.fsf@codesourcery.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2006-12/txt/msg00046.txt.bz2

On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 11:12:59AM -0800, Jim Blandy wrote:
> 
> Here's the patch I've been using for this.  It'd be better to rework
> the way those functions use those obstacks, but...
> 
> 2006-12-05  Jim Blandy  <jimb@codesourcery.com>
> 
>       * cp-valprint.c (cp_print_value_fields, cp_print_value):
>       Initialize tmp_obstack, to avoid warnings.
>       * p-valprint.c (pascal_object_print_value_fields)
>       (pascal_object_print_value): Same.
>   

What is wrong with

http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2006-12/msg00008.html


H.J.