Re: GDB 6.5.90 available for testing (GDB 6.6 pre-release)

Markus Deuling
2006-12-13T11:47:35Z

Hello all,

Markus Deuling schrieb:
> Hi Mark,
>
> Mark Kettenis schrieb:
>>> Here's the patch I've been using for this. It'd be better to rework
>>> the way those functions use those obstacks, but...
>>>
>>> 2006-12-05 Jim Blandy <jimb@codesourcery.com>
>>>
>>> * cp-valprint.c (cp_print_value_fields, cp_print_value):
>>> Initialize tmp_obstack, to avoid warnings.
>>> * p-valprint.c (pascal_object_print_value_fields)
>>> (pascal_object_print_value): Same.
>>
>> This is silly, at least if they are really unecessary. It's a bug in GCC
>> and should be fixed. I mean, GCC should get better at detecting this
>> sort
>> of things; not give more false positives.
>>
>> Markus, can you file a GCC bug report for this?
>
> I opened a GCC bugzilla:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30086

the GCC Bugzilla I opened was marked duplicated. This is the current
bugzilla for this topic:

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5035

Regards,
Markus

--
Markus Deuling
GNU Toolchain for Linux on Cell BE
deuling@de.ibm.com