From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8338 invoked by alias); 2 Dec 2006 18:06:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 8321 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Dec 2006 18:06:09 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nile.gnat.com (HELO nile.gnat.com) (205.232.38.5) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 02 Dec 2006 18:06:04 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C61948CE40; Sat, 2 Dec 2006 13:06:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from nile.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nile.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 29945-01-7; Sat, 2 Dec 2006 13:06:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from takamaka.act-europe.fr (unknown [70.71.0.212]) by nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19F1648CDC5; Sat, 2 Dec 2006 13:06:02 -0500 (EST) Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 225F034C099; Sat, 2 Dec 2006 10:06:31 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2006 18:06:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: "H. J. Lu" Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: GDB 6.6 branch FROZEN Message-ID: <20061202180631.GW3304@adacore.com> References: <20061202174613.GU3304@adacore.com> <20061202175623.GA14513@lucon.org> <20061202180259.GV3304@adacore.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061202180259.GV3304@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-12/txt/msg00008.txt.bz2 > I am not opposed, but I don't know readline very well. I'll pass > for this pre-release, but can you send the question on gdb-patches > and ask if the patch is safe enough for the branch? I'll defer > to the judgment of the global maintainers. Actually, I was trying to find out who approved the patch, but it looks like it's not checked in the head either. Let's get it approved for the head first, and ask whether it's ok for the branch while we're at it. Thanks, -- Joel