From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28550 invoked by alias); 20 Nov 2006 20:18:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 28540 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Nov 2006 20:18:00 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 20:17:56 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GmFaS-00074n-Gq; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 15:17:52 -0500 Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 20:18:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: binary.chen@gmail.com, gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: When will the gcc not include full path in the debug info Message-ID: <20061120201752.GA27178@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii , binary.chen@gmail.com, gdb@sourceware.org References: <4561b069.2356ae07.3fc8.466c@mx.google.com> <20061120140556.GB31834@nevyn.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-11/txt/msg00148.txt.bz2 On Mon, Nov 20, 2006 at 10:13:35PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > IIRC, there _is_ a way to do this: use COFF debug info (if you can). > It has place only for the file name, not the leading directories. The full pathname isn't the only thing you'd lose, I imagine! Like modern C++ support, macros, a routinely tested debug reader... -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery