From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21037 invoked by alias); 17 Nov 2006 20:14:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 21029 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Nov 2006 20:14:42 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Nov 2006 20:14:36 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1GlA6b-00032f-2b; Fri, 17 Nov 2006 15:14:33 -0500 Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 20:14:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: jbbachky@aim.com Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: gdbserver/gdb-6/4 and lots of pthreads Message-ID: <20061117201433.GB11609@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: jbbachky@aim.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <8C8D6E7E15FE5F6-5D0-723B@mblk-d22.sysops.aol.com> <20061115164953.GA31009@nevyn.them.org> <8C8D7E0B004BE30-C20-26F0@mblk-d23.sysops.aol.com> <20061116220412.GA28527@nevyn.them.org> <8C8D88FE433FC88-C20-54B0@mblk-d23.sysops.aol.com> <20061117190759.GA8764@nevyn.them.org> <8C8D89A3DC3857F-C20-593A@mblk-d23.sysops.aol.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8C8D89A3DC3857F-C20-593A@mblk-d23.sysops.aol.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-11/txt/msg00132.txt.bz2 On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 03:01:01PM -0500, jbbachky@aim.com wrote: > > >On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 01:46:56PM -0500, jbbachky@aim.com wrote: > >>Sending packet: > >> > $QPassSignals:e;10;11;13;14;17;18;1a;1b;1c;1e;1f;20;21;24;25;4c;#af...Ack > > > > >Ignore signal 0xe. In the GDB remote protocol that is SIGALRM. > > > I had "handle SIGALRM nostop noprint" in my .gdbinit file I had added > that while > digging into this problem a while ago and had forgotten about it. > Removing it > and re-running everything doesn't appear to have an effect. In That's the default, so it should make no difference. > This is the CVS version from Wednesday evening, with your patch > contained here: > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2006-11/msg00114.html That should be fine. But update to today's CVS with no extra patches just to be sure. If it's still doing this, then I would recommend a debugging printf in linux-low.c, right before the new if statement with the pass_signals[] check. pass_signals[target_signal_from_host (WSTOPSIG (wstat))] ought to be set for SIGALRM, and we ought not to return it to GDB, but your log says we did that. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery