From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15841 invoked by alias); 16 Nov 2006 22:04:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 15832 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Nov 2006 22:04:21 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Nov 2006 22:04:14 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1GkpLA-0007SG-2i; Thu, 16 Nov 2006 17:04:12 -0500 Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 22:04:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: jbbachky@aim.com Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: gdbserver/gdb-6/4 and lots of pthreads Message-ID: <20061116220412.GA28527@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: jbbachky@aim.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <8C8D6E7E15FE5F6-5D0-723B@mblk-d22.sysops.aol.com> <20061115164953.GA31009@nevyn.them.org> <8C8D7E0B004BE30-C20-26F0@mblk-d23.sysops.aol.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8C8D7E0B004BE30-C20-26F0@mblk-d23.sysops.aol.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-11/txt/msg00116.txt.bz2 On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 04:52:47PM -0500, jbbachky@aim.com wrote: > After working through a couple of configure bugs (configure #defines > HAVE_TD_THR_TLS_GET_ADDR to 1 even when the test properly fails), I > still seem to have the same symptoms. Oops. I see what's wrong with the check, I'll fix it now. Thanks. > I have noticed that I now hit the default clause in the ptrace system > call handler a few times - because there is not a case for > PTRACE_GETSIGINFO in linux 2.6.10). Is this a/the problem? In the mean > time, I'll trying to locate a definition for that case and make it work > on my architectures. PTRACE_GETSIGINFO is much older than that, so I'm not sure why, but it should not be relevant to this feature. > Daniel, is any settings and/or initialization things that I need to do > in order to make use of your patch? No. Could you capture a log using "set debug remote 1" of a session which shows the problem? -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery