From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6697 invoked by alias); 9 Nov 2006 19:36:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 6671 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Nov 2006 19:36:19 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nile.gnat.com (HELO nile.gnat.com) (205.232.38.5) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Nov 2006 19:36:07 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B30848CF6C; Thu, 9 Nov 2006 14:36:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from nile.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nile.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 14260-01-2; Thu, 9 Nov 2006 14:36:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from takamaka.act-europe.fr (S0106000f3d96cb6d.vc.shawcable.net [24.84.195.170]) by nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD23448CEA5; Thu, 9 Nov 2006 14:36:04 -0500 (EST) Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 78FAB34C099; Thu, 9 Nov 2006 11:36:23 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2006 19:36:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Bob Wilson , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Time for GDB 6.6 branch ... Message-ID: <20061109193623.GD3904@adacore.com> References: <20061109163301.GA3505@adacore.com> <45536732.7090002@tensilica.com> <20061109182015.GA13038@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061109182015.GA13038@nevyn.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-11/txt/msg00049.txt.bz2 > > I'd really like to see the Xtensa port make it into this release. It > > depends on someone finding time to review it, though, and there's no reason > > to hold up creating the branch for it -- assuming that if the port is > > approved before the 6.6 release, we could add it to the branch. > > FYI, I would too - and I hope hope hope that I will have time to sit > down and review GDB patches this afternoon, at which point I will get > to it. Note that I would accept patches in the branch for new ports, as long as we can be reasonably sure that the additions cannot affect the rest of the code. I think that Andrew, the previous release manager, also used that policy. -- Joel