From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29874 invoked by alias); 9 Nov 2006 18:20:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 29866 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Nov 2006 18:20:44 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Nov 2006 18:20:33 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1GiEVb-0003TY-UK; Thu, 09 Nov 2006 13:20:16 -0500 Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2006 18:20:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Bob Wilson Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Time for GDB 6.6 branch ... Message-ID: <20061109182015.GA13038@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Bob Wilson , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <20061109163301.GA3505@adacore.com> <45536732.7090002@tensilica.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45536732.7090002@tensilica.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-11/txt/msg00048.txt.bz2 On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 09:36:50AM -0800, Bob Wilson wrote: > >Is there anything that's in progress for which the branch creation > >should be delayed? > > I'd really like to see the Xtensa port make it into this release. It > depends on someone finding time to review it, though, and there's no reason > to hold up creating the branch for it -- assuming that if the port is > approved before the 6.6 release, we could add it to the branch. FYI, I would too - and I hope hope hope that I will have time to sit down and review GDB patches this afternoon, at which point I will get to it. Of course, this is where I repeat my call for help: other GDB maintainers can review patches too! -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery