From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8949 invoked by alias); 8 Nov 2006 01:58:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 8940 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Nov 2006 01:58:08 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Nov 2006 01:57:55 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1GhchM-0001C0-OI; Tue, 07 Nov 2006 20:57:52 -0500 Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 01:58:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC] MinGW and i386_pe_skip_trampoline_code Message-ID: <20061108015752.GA4565@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Pedro Alves , gdb@sourceware.org References: <455125A3.30304@portugalmail.pt> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <455125A3.30304@portugalmail.pt> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-11/txt/msg00035.txt.bz2 On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 12:32:35AM +0000, Pedro Alves wrote: > Hi all, > > Just looking at PE support code, and I noticed that in i386-cygwin-tdep.c, > there is a call to set_gdbarch_skip_trampoline_code that will eventually > register > i386_pe_skip_trampoline_code, defined in i386-tdep.c. > From the looks of it, that function will skip 'import lib > stubs'/trampolines. > I wonder why gdb for MinGW doesn't register it too? Probably an > oversight, no? The FSF tree doesn't even support native GDB on MinGW, to the best of my knowledge. The MinGW people have local patches that I don't believe have ever been submitted (this is hearsay, I've never looked myself). -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery