From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14377 invoked by alias); 26 Oct 2006 21:16:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 14362 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Oct 2006 21:16:34 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Oct 2006 21:16:28 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1GdCaO-0005Xp-KM; Thu, 26 Oct 2006 17:16:24 -0400 Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 21:16:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Jim Blandy Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [rfc/remote] Tell remote stubs which signals are boring Message-ID: <20061026211624.GA21239@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Jim Blandy , gdb@sourceware.org References: <20061025212441.GA622@nevyn.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-10/txt/msg00272.txt.bz2 On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 02:11:25PM -0700, Jim Blandy wrote: > (Thanks, Mark, for asking about this!) Please don't use a space to > mark the end of the packet name. At the moment, the remote protocol > documentation uses spaces just for clarity; if they become meaningful, > then we're going to have to revamp our manual notation --- again. > > The text in "Overview" suggests using ',', ';', or ':'. Typo in the documentation. The top of the general query packets page is quite clear that it ought to be a colon, and so it is. Thanks. > > Each listed SIGNAL, using the same signal numbering used in > > I'd like to see "and syntax" added here --- I assume that's so? How much syntax is there to a single number? -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery