From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27481 invoked by alias); 26 Oct 2006 15:37:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 27473 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Oct 2006 15:37:46 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Oct 2006 15:37:34 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1Gd7IS-0001Eq-5X for gdb@sourceware.org; Thu, 26 Oct 2006 11:37:32 -0400 Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 15:37:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [rfc/remote] Tell remote stubs which signals are boring Message-ID: <20061026153732.GA4358@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb@sourceware.org References: <20061025212441.GA622@nevyn.them.org> <453FEB98.8090202@avtrex.com> <20061026014027.GA9023@nevyn.them.org> <20061026121838.GA28927@nevyn.them.org> <13276.192.87.1.22.1161876431.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <13276.192.87.1.22.1161876431.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-10/txt/msg00267.txt.bz2 On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 05:27:11PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > Perhaps I should even add more confusing statements to that. What if I say > "handle SIGALRM nostop noprint pass" after I've connected to the remote > target. Will it send a new QPassSignals packet when I do that? AFAICT > from your patch it doesn't do that, and that seems broken to me. In fact it will do that. We check that the most recently sent QPassSignals packet matches the current set of ignored signals at every resume. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery