From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Breakpoints in delay slots
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 14:04:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061018140353.GB7083@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <453608FC.2040201@st.com>
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 11:59:08AM +0100, Andrew STUBBS wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> There is an occasional issue debugging programs on processors that use
> delay slots - in my case the SH4.
>
> The problem occurs when a breakpoint is placed on the delay slot
> instruction. This can happen when this instruction happens to be the
> first instruction of a source line, or when the user sets the breakpoint
> on a specific address.
>
> In the case of the SH4, the breakpoint instruction (at least the one we
> use) is illegal in a delay slot. This means that, instead of triggering
> the breakpoint, an illegal slot exception is raised which the user
> program is expected to handle and usually results in a panic.
>
> In any case, even if the breakpoint were handled as normal, there is the
> problem of where the program should be resumed. It is incorrect to set
> the PC to the slot instruction because this will ignore the branch. The
> correct thing is to set the PC to the address of the branch/slot pair -
> i.e. 2 bytes back in the case of the SH4.
>
> There is no general way to identify a delay slot from instruction
> analysis - any instruction may be preceded by data which looks like a
> branch with a slot, and there is the danger of reading addresses outside
> memory - so there is no way to avoid the situation in the first place.
> Similarly, there is no way to identify that a breakpoint just hit was in
> a slot unless you make a note of how it was hit.
>
> I need a way to solve this problem. Any suggestions?
This is a remarkable mess. Unsurprisingly you aren't the first person
to have this sort of problem, so GDB has a certain amount of support
for delay slots, but MIPS at least is much friendlier: you can use the
same breakpoint instruction, and there's a bit in the cause register
that lets you know you were in a delay slot.
When you have a symbol file, does that suffice to let you know what
is code and what is data?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-18 14:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-18 10:59 Andrew STUBBS
2006-10-18 14:04 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2006-10-18 18:51 ` Michael Snyder
2006-10-19 9:52 ` Andrew STUBBS
2006-10-19 23:20 ` Michael Snyder
2006-10-19 19:51 ` Mark Kettenis
2006-10-20 8:42 ` Andrew STUBBS
2006-10-22 19:47 ` Mark Kettenis
2006-10-20 8:51 ` Andrew STUBBS
2006-10-20 14:26 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-10-20 21:18 ` Jim Blandy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061018140353.GB7083@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox