From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12391 invoked by alias); 13 Oct 2006 22:03:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 12383 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Oct 2006 22:03:34 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 Oct 2006 22:03:31 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1GYV7h-0006bS-VW; Fri, 13 Oct 2006 18:03:22 -0400 Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 22:03:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Michael Snyder Cc: Wu Zhou , gdb@sourceware.org, Joel Brobecker , Ramana Radhakrishnan Subject: Re: a question about rs6k's prologue analysis Message-ID: <20061013220321.GA25288@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Michael Snyder , Wu Zhou , gdb@sourceware.org, Joel Brobecker , Ramana Radhakrishnan References: <452CC397.5050304@cn.ibm.com> <1160563558.5061.15.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20061011135335.GB25745@nevyn.them.org> <20061011162208.GX1065@adacore.com> <452DBDA0.6070202@cn.ibm.com> <452F125B.9040609@cn.ibm.com> <1160766564.14535.263.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1160766564.14535.263.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-10/txt/msg00095.txt.bz2 On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 12:09:24PM -0700, Michael Snyder wrote: > On Fri, 2006-10-13 at 12:13 +0800, Wu Zhou wrote: > > > < ERROR: internal buffer is full. > > < UNRESOLVED: gdb.base/checkpoint.exp: info checkpoints with at least 600 checkpoints > > --- > > > PASS: gdb.base/checkpoint.exp: info checkpoints with at least 600 checkpoints > > > > *** Patched gdb have an internal buffer full error, which make checkpoint.exp have a unresolved case. > > Could you run the checkpoint.exp test by itself, and post the > relevant portion of the gdb.log file? > > > > > > 11453a11453 > > > PASS: gdb.threads/schedlock.exp: other thread 0 didn't run > > 11455d11454 > > < PASS: gdb.threads/schedlock.exp: other thread 1 didn't run > > 11472a11472 > > > PASS: gdb.threads/schedlock.exp: other thread 0 didn't run (stepping) > > 11474d11473 > > < PASS: gdb.threads/schedlock.exp: other thread 1 didn't run (stepping) > > > > *** patched gdb has two PASSes which occur at different thread. > > Could you also run this test by itself and post the gdb.log? All of these tests are timing sensitive. I don't know why for checkpoint.exp - that one can probably be fixed. For schedlock, I think we ought to weaken the tests somewhat; right now, it's very sensitive to load on the test machine. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery