From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22851 invoked by alias); 29 Sep 2006 19:37:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 22842 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Sep 2006 19:37:11 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 19:37:06 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1GTOAS-0007pc-Ho for gdb@sourceware.org; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:37:04 -0400 Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 19:37:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: dwarf2-frame vs set_loc Message-ID: <20060929193704.GA30056@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb@sourceware.org References: <20060928224245.GA21955@nevyn.them.org> <20060929193344.GD1626@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060929193344.GD1626@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-09/txt/msg00192.txt.bz2 On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 12:33:44PM -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote: > What's the status at the compiler level, by the way? Still backed out? > If this is the case, I might have to work a bit harder to still be able > to reproduce the problem, because the compiler I have access to is > rebuilt nightly. I should have made a copy of the compiler :-/. Still backed out; presumably going to stay that way, since Jakub made some entirely correct points about why this is a bad idea. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery