From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29385 invoked by alias); 20 Sep 2006 15:49:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 29376 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Sep 2006 15:49:55 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 15:49:50 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1GQ4KZ-0004b0-LS; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 11:49:47 -0400 Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 15:49:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Mark Kettenis Cc: pgilliam@us.ibm.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com, sjmunroe@us.ibm.com, John Reiser Subject: Re: breaks at thread create and delete fail on PPC64/Linux Message-ID: <20060920154947.GA17599@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Mark Kettenis , pgilliam@us.ibm.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com, sjmunroe@us.ibm.com, John Reiser References: <1156806903.5898.29.camel@dufur.beaverton.ibm.com> <20060828232206.GA27059@nevyn.them.org> <200608291903.k7TJ3VPb001854@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200608291903.k7TJ3VPb001854@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-09/txt/msg00117.txt.bz2 On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 09:03:31PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > Normally we get an event right before a shared library and its > dependencies is loaded and right after. At that last event things are > supposed to be in a consistent state, so relocations should have been > processed (except for relocations to be resilved by lazy binding of > course). I happened to stumble across this bug report from John Reiser today, which seems to explain Paul's trouble: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2328 He's even got a patch for it, but it isn't in the bug report. John, any change that you could break it out of the other patches and submit it? In the mean time, it's over here: http://www.bitwagon.com/glibc-audit/glibc-audit.html -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery