From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2335 invoked by alias); 19 Sep 2006 03:17:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 2327 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Sep 2006 03:17:06 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Sep 2006 03:17:01 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1GPW6U-00055g-L5 for gdb@sourceware.org; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 23:16:58 -0400 Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 03:17:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: "gdb@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: gdb-6.5 produces infinite backtrace on ARM Message-ID: <20060919031658.GA19359@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: "gdb@sourceware.org" References: <44E181DE.7040905@imc-berlin.de> <20060815124053.GA18496@nevyn.them.org> <20060819052434.GA15612@nevyn.them.org> <1158629994.20759.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1158629994.20759.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-09/txt/msg00098.txt.bz2 On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 06:39:53PM -0700, Michael Snyder wrote: > > This isn't ideal - we could detect the pthread_start_thread function > > name and stop automatically, which might be a wise addition - but it's > > better than going off into the woods. > > > > There's about 250 lines of changes involved, to one of the more > > complicated parts of GDB, so I will need to go over the patches again > > and post them separately. But I'll try to make sure this is fixed > > soon. > > Daniel, did you ever get around to posting your patch? > > I have now run into this self-same problem myself, and > would be glad to work with you on getting it handled. > Rather not duplicate effort, though... Yes. You can find them here: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2006-08/msg00129.html http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2006-08/msg00130.html http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2006-08/msg00131.html There was some discussion and I haven't been back to it yet. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery