From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11781 invoked by alias); 10 Sep 2006 16:27:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 11773 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Sep 2006 16:27:59 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Sep 2006 16:27:56 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1GMS9x-0001RQ-Td; Sun, 10 Sep 2006 12:27:54 -0400 Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 16:27:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Alex Bligh Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: thread_db_get_info: cannot get thread info: generic error on fork()/execvp() Message-ID: <20060910162753.GA29405@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Alex Bligh , gdb@sourceware.org References: <20060726214801.14303.qmail@sourceware.org> <20060718124206.30754.qmail@sourceware.org> <20060731130001.GA1823@nevyn.them.org> <44DF8D67.8090502@alex.org.uk> <44F5BCAB.7050400@alex.org.uk> <20060830181439.GA29333@nevyn.them.org> <44F6BA49.1000303@alex.org.uk> <20060831122025.GA28488@nevyn.them.org> <44F6F077.5020606@alex.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44F6F077.5020606@alex.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-09/txt/msg00059.txt.bz2 On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 03:21:43PM +0100, Alex Bligh wrote: > >>and (ideally) providing > >>that and the previous thread fix so debugging as a backport to > >>the Ubuntu Dapper gdb. > > > >Obviously not our problem. If you want fixes for Ubuntu, ask Ubuntu. > > OK will do. Would it be possible to drop the list (or me) a line with > the relevant RCS revisions in to fix this? I think there was an > earlier fix that needed to be applied as well (as per the PR). This patch is: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2006-09/msg00053.html The other patch I was thinking of is probably this one: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2006-07/msg00104.html -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery