From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10184 invoked by alias); 7 Sep 2006 16:15:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 10080 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Sep 2006 16:15:02 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nile.gnat.com (HELO nile.gnat.com) (205.232.38.5) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Sep 2006 16:14:58 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDE9F48CDAC; Thu, 7 Sep 2006 12:14:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nile.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nile.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 11232-01-2; Thu, 7 Sep 2006 12:14:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from takamaka.act-europe.fr (unknown [70.71.0.212]) by nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6845C48CD9A; Thu, 7 Sep 2006 12:14:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 507) id D207247EFA; Thu, 7 Sep 2006 09:14:55 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2006 16:15:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Ray Duran Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: gdb build error Message-ID: <20060907161455.GB24293@adacore.com> References: <3CE39F664D1EE14293F6923CD00E42C704CD96A3@montremsg32.na.future.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3CE39F664D1EE14293F6923CD00E42C704CD96A3@montremsg32.na.future.ca> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-09/txt/msg00043.txt.bz2 > However, I have done a search of ada-lex.c and cannot find anywhere. > That in fact make the message a bit of an anomaly, since the warning > says that ada-lex.c is older but it does not exist. I'm pretty sure it used to exist at the time you unpacked the sources. It must has been deleted somehow. The makefile says: .l.c: if [ "$(FLEX)" ] && $(FLEX) --version >/dev/null 2>&1; then \ $(FLEX) -o$@ $< && \ rm -f $@.new && \ sed -e '/extern.*malloc/d' \ -e '/extern.*realloc/d' \ -e '/extern.*free/d' \ -e '/include.*malloc.h/d' \ -e 's/\([^x]\)malloc/\1xmalloc/g' \ -e 's/\([^x]\)realloc/\1xrealloc/g' \ -e 's/yy_flex_xrealloc/yyxrealloc/g' \ < $@ > $@.new && \ rm -f $@ && \ mv $@.new $@; \ elif [ -f $@ ]; then \ echo "Warning: $*.c older than $*.l and flex not available."; \ else \ echo "$@ missing and flex not available."; \ false; \ fi so the file MUST have existed for the warning you mentioned to be printed (the -f test). I can't really figure out what happened in your case without more details. If you start from scratch, and send us the list of commands you used to build your application, then maybe we'll be able to understand what happened. Please also tell us exactly what package you downloaded, and where you got it: > If I re-downloaded insight tar 6.5 or an earlier version could I > configure and build Insight over what I have already done? There isn't > any need for deleting old insight stuff? Are you sure you mean insight? The last releases only included GDB, not insight. -- Joel