From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-26104-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 31621 invoked by alias); 21 Aug 2006 14:52:54 -0000
Received: (qmail 31597 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Aug 2006 14:52:51 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 14:52:47 +0000
Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) 	id 1GFB8n-0005D5-Tj; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 10:52:37 -0400
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 14:52:00 -0000
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
Cc: Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, 	Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>, gdb@sourceware.org, 	libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Notes on a frame_unwind_address_in_block problem
Message-ID: <20060821145237.GA19993@nevyn.them.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>, 	Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, 	Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>, gdb@sourceware.org, 	libc-alpha@sourceware.org
References: <20060706222157.GA1377@nevyn.them.org> <200608030438.18827.ak@suse.de> <20060803024819.GA6543@nevyn.them.org> <200608030511.46390.ak@suse.de> <20060803032136.GA7647@nevyn.them.org> <m38xlmqdz0.fsf@gromit.moeb> <20060818151519.GA28356@nevyn.them.org> <hozmdywjzg.fsf@reger.suse.de> <44E9C0B6.3050708@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <44E9C0B6.3050708@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2006-08/txt/msg00160.txt.bz2

On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 07:18:30AM -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> > Ah I see.  Ulrich, Roland, what do you suggest here?
> 
> Nothig but the latest binutils is in any case supported.  We just don't
> enforce using the latest version if older versions "by accident" still
> work.  If there is something to require the new tools, definitely use
> them and update the binutils version check in the configure script.

Thanks.  I'll revise the patch.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery