From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23073 invoked by alias); 11 Aug 2006 20:13:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 23059 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Aug 2006 20:13:54 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nile.gnat.com (HELO nile.gnat.com) (205.232.38.5) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Aug 2006 20:13:43 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7070048CF77; Fri, 11 Aug 2006 16:13:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nile.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nile.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 19203-01-5; Fri, 11 Aug 2006 16:13:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from takamaka.act-europe.fr (unknown [70.71.0.212]) by nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C2D848CDC5; Fri, 11 Aug 2006 16:13:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 507) id E219547EFA; Fri, 11 Aug 2006 13:13:31 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 20:13:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: How to set a breakpoint in file, which name has spaces? Message-ID: <20060811201331.GA533@adacore.com> References: <44D98D66.9060202@sun.com> <44DAD087.30004@sun.com> <20060810125827.GA18306@nevyn.them.org> <44DB6093.4030905@sun.com> <20060810175119.GA26275@nevyn.them.org> <44DC151F.3030009@sun.com> <20060811134842.GA19749@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-08/txt/msg00105.txt.bz2 > > I wonder if, for some major version bump, we should document a new > > syntax for referring to source locations and implement it from > > scratch? > > That sounds like a good idea. Joel, perhaps you could kindly remind > us about this when ``some major version bump'' will be around the > corner. I will try to remember. IMO, it wouldn't be a bad idea to design and implement the new syntax now. We can then decide to do the major version number bump. -- Joel