From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29853 invoked by alias); 9 Aug 2006 22:05:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 29837 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Aug 2006 22:05:00 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Aug 2006 22:04:58 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1GAwAa-0000jB-So for gdb@sourceware.org; Wed, 09 Aug 2006 18:04:56 -0400 Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2006 22:05:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Problem with new step-bt test? Message-ID: <20060809220456.GA2781@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb@sourceware.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-08/txt/msg00079.txt.bz2 (gdb) PASS: gdb.base/step-bt.exp: step second instruction bt #0 hello () at /space/fsf/commit/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/step-bt.c:27 #1 0x00000000004004d1 in main () at /space/fsf/commit/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/step-bt.c:33 (gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/step-bt.exp: backtrace after second instruction step testcase /space/fsf/commit/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/step-bt.exp completed in 2 seconds I figure that ought to be a PASS output, right? I think the problem is that the two hex patterns need to be optional, but I haven't tried it. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery