From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-25870-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 31960 invoked by alias); 18 Jul 2006 17:59:13 -0000
Received: (qmail 31944 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Jul 2006 17:59:12 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jul 2006 17:59:10 +0000
Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) 	id 1G2tqb-0005ww-Hf; Tue, 18 Jul 2006 13:59:05 -0400
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 18:35:00 -0000
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
Cc: andrew.stubbs@st.com, gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Flipping ifelse.exp test
Message-ID: <20060718175905.GA22855@nevyn.them.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>, 	andrew.stubbs@st.com, gdb@sourceware.org
References: <200607172302.k6HN2mlx002514@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20060717234035.GA29855@nevyn.them.org> <44BCAA7C.6030503@st.com> <200607181758.k6IHwVeR005800@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200607181758.k6IHwVeR005800@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2006-07/txt/msg00131.txt.bz2

On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 07:58:31PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 10:31:40 +0100
> > From: Andrew STUBBS <andrew.stubbs@st.com>
> > 
> > Hmmm, the point of the 'got here' was to ensure that GDB hadn't died 
> > horribly, and that it was still capable of running commands. I think the 
> > problem was that there is no output from the actual statement being 
> > tested. That was with the original script I had. Perhaps now it is 
> > implemented with gdb_test_multiple the prompt is enough.
> 
> I think it is.  Worst case, you'll get timeouts when things break
> again.  Hopefully those will be annoying enough that things get fixed
> again soon ;-).

Yeah, I agree.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery