From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25742 invoked by alias); 17 Jul 2006 13:43:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 25695 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Jul 2006 13:43:26 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Jul 2006 13:43:23 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1G2TNY-0002i0-Fg; Mon, 17 Jul 2006 09:43:20 -0400 Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 13:49:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Bob Rossi Cc: teawater , gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: How about remote MI? Message-ID: <20060717134320.GA10281@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Bob Rossi , teawater , gdb@sourceware.org References: <20060717005720.GA29042@nevyn.them.org> <20060717132709.GB513@brasko.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060717132709.GB513@brasko.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-07/txt/msg00116.txt.bz2 On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 09:27:10AM -0400, Bob Rossi wrote: > There ia at least one possibility I can think of that would improve > upon GDB/MI by having it connect back to the FE via a TCP socket. > > That is, it would avoid the 'tty' issue, by allowing the FE to put a > single pty between the FE and GDB, and having all the MI protocol > on a totally separate channel. I don't see any advantage over using the "set tty" command now that we've got it... -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery