From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13815 invoked by alias); 14 Jul 2006 14:33:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 13806 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Jul 2006 14:33:34 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nile.gnat.com (HELO nile.gnat.com) (205.232.38.5) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jul 2006 14:33:29 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B8EA48CE0E; Fri, 14 Jul 2006 10:33:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nile.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nile.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 06883-01-3; Fri, 14 Jul 2006 10:33:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from takamaka.act-europe.fr (unknown [70.71.0.212]) by nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1BEA48CCB9; Fri, 14 Jul 2006 10:33:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 507) id D129D47EFA; Fri, 14 Jul 2006 07:33:25 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 15:34:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Eli Zaretskii , luoyi.ly@gmail.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: 6.5 doesn't support mingw ? Message-ID: <20060714143325.GH1322@adacore.com> References: <20060714070916.GA1322@adacore.com> <20060714130726.GB24712@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060714130726.GB24712@nevyn.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-07/txt/msg00091.txt.bz2 > Quite a lot I suspect. win32-nat.c is only designed to work on Cygwin. > Someone who was interested in native, non-Cygwin-based debugging would > have to work on it, and keep the changes clean enough to not overly > complicate the Cygwin support (per our last discussion on this > subject). It would probably be at least a few weeks work. I have been working here on a native mingw, and it actually is not that much work to get something functional. I had to put that project on hold for a while, however, due to some scheduling conflicts and business trips. I hope to resume it soon (hopefully in a week or two), and submit these changes. The changes I made are against a gdb-6.4 baseline but it shouldn't be a problem to merge them into mainline. Let me see if I can dig out the patches I already have, if anyone is interested. -- Joel