From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8798 invoked by alias); 26 Jun 2006 14:56:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 8788 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Jun 2006 14:56:36 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nile.gnat.com (HELO nile.gnat.com) (205.232.38.5) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 14:56:35 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42A4D48CDEE; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 10:55:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nile.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nile.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 13600-02; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 10:55:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from takamaka.act-europe.fr (s142-179-108-108.bc.hsia.telus.net [142.179.108.108]) by nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CD0D48CDCC; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 10:55:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 507) id 1A27647E7F; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 07:55:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 10:06:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Andreas Schwab Cc: gdb@sourceware.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com, Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: Should "dir" override the full path encoded in debug info? Message-ID: <20060626145536.GL22750@adacore.com> References: <20060624133051.GB26555@nevyn.them.org> <20060625040715.GH22750@adacore.com> <20060626015318.GI22750@adacore.com> <20060626015636.GA14263@nevyn.them.org> <20060626020333.GA22589@brasko.net> <20060626021945.GA14880@nevyn.them.org> <20060626024422.GJ22750@adacore.com> <20060626145036.GK22750@adacore.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060626145036.GK22750@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-06/txt/msg00243.txt.bz2 Message-ID: <20060627100600.lHRuKXalmWzU5pXXY9xHlWiWQEIUjdONuEAKUfo2Yyo@z> > > How about adding subcommands `add' and `remove' and having more than one > > substitution rule? > > I personally think that would be overkill... Others? However, the idea of having (gdb) substitute-path add from to (gdb) substitute-path remove (gdb) substitute-path Is interesting. The third case would print the current substitution rule. -- Joel