From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16840 invoked by alias); 26 Jun 2006 02:19:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 16826 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Jun 2006 02:19:49 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 02:19:48 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1FughV-0003sI-UL; Sun, 25 Jun 2006 22:19:46 -0400 Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 02:44:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb@sourceware.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com Cc: Joel Brobecker , Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: Should "dir" override the full path encoded in debug info? Message-ID: <20060626021945.GA14880@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb@sourceware.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com, Joel Brobecker , Eli Zaretskii References: <20060624071058.GD22750@adacore.com> <20060624075143.GF22750@adacore.com> <20060624133051.GB26555@nevyn.them.org> <20060625040715.GH22750@adacore.com> <20060626015318.GI22750@adacore.com> <20060626015636.GA14263@nevyn.them.org> <20060626020333.GA22589@brasko.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060626020333.GA22589@brasko.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-06/txt/msg00225.txt.bz2 On Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 10:03:34PM -0400, Bob Rossi wrote: > On Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 09:56:36PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 06:53:18PM -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote: > > > > I think there's no need to mention `source', since `dir' doesn't, > > > > either. So how about `subst-dir' or `alt-dir'? > > > > > > I'm ok with alt-dir. Any objection? > > > > I think it's been condensed a little too far; I'd think it was an > > alternate to "dir", which isn't quite the case. Would substitute-dir > > be too wordy? > > Please correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't something like > substitute-path be more correct. I mean, this doesn't relate to a dir or > a filename does it? I may not completly understand what the new > functions input/output is though. Works for me. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16844 invoked by alias); 26 Jun 2006 02:19:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 16827 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Jun 2006 02:19:49 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 02:19:48 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1FughV-0003sI-UL; Sun, 25 Jun 2006 22:19:46 -0400 Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 03:23:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb@sourceware.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com Cc: Joel Brobecker , Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: Should "dir" override the full path encoded in debug info? Message-ID: <20060626021945.GA14880@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb@sourceware.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com, Joel Brobecker , Eli Zaretskii References: <20060624071058.GD22750@adacore.com> <20060624075143.GF22750@adacore.com> <20060624133051.GB26555@nevyn.them.org> <20060625040715.GH22750@adacore.com> <20060626015318.GI22750@adacore.com> <20060626015636.GA14263@nevyn.them.org> <20060626020333.GA22589@brasko.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060626020333.GA22589@brasko.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-06/txt/msg00226.txt.bz2 Message-ID: <20060626032300.c4J86u3TlK2tHLz2HadmS8XSoGIav-DexsD_cxzEOao@z> On Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 10:03:34PM -0400, Bob Rossi wrote: > On Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 09:56:36PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 06:53:18PM -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote: > > > > I think there's no need to mention `source', since `dir' doesn't, > > > > either. So how about `subst-dir' or `alt-dir'? > > > > > > I'm ok with alt-dir. Any objection? > > > > I think it's been condensed a little too far; I'd think it was an > > alternate to "dir", which isn't quite the case. Would substitute-dir > > be too wordy? > > Please correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't something like > substitute-path be more correct. I mean, this doesn't relate to a dir or > a filename does it? I may not completly understand what the new > functions input/output is though. Works for me. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery