From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13167 invoked by alias); 26 Jun 2006 01:53:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 13051 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Jun 2006 01:53:26 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nile.gnat.com (HELO nile.gnat.com) (205.232.38.5) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 01:53:22 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 446A948CC0E; Sun, 25 Jun 2006 21:53:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nile.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nile.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 02582-01-2; Sun, 25 Jun 2006 21:53:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from takamaka.act-europe.fr (s142-179-108-108.bc.hsia.telus.net [142.179.108.108]) by nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE85C48CBDB; Sun, 25 Jun 2006 21:53:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 507) id 2F30847E7F; Sun, 25 Jun 2006 18:53:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 01:56:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Should "dir" override the full path encoded in debug info? Message-ID: <20060626015318.GI22750@adacore.com> References: <20060623201019.GX22750@adacore.com> <20060624065920.GB22750@adacore.com> <20060624071058.GD22750@adacore.com> <20060624075143.GF22750@adacore.com> <20060624133051.GB26555@nevyn.them.org> <20060625040715.GH22750@adacore.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-06/txt/msg00222.txt.bz2 > I think there's no need to mention `source', since `dir' doesn't, > either. So how about `subst-dir' or `alt-dir'? I'm ok with alt-dir. Any objection? -- Joel