From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26989 invoked by alias); 23 Jun 2006 21:52:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 26979 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Jun 2006 21:52:47 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 21:52:44 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1FttZy-0001Yb-P5 for gdb@sourceware.org; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 17:52:42 -0400 Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2006 02:24:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [remote] RFC: Replace qPart with qXfer Message-ID: <20060623215242.GA5944@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb@sourceware.org References: <20060622031731.GA26722@nevyn.them.org> <20060623171419.GA28992@nevyn.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-06/txt/msg00196.txt.bz2 On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 09:06:30PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > In the case in point, I think that "*Note FOO, and *Note BAR" sounds > better than with the extra "see". You don't have the "in" in your > sentence, so the situation is different from what the manual > describes. In the printed version, removing "see" will produce this: > > See Section X.YZ [OS Information], page 123, and Section A.BC > [read-aux-vector], page 456. > > which is okay, I think. Gotcha. Thanks. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery