From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31829 invoked by alias); 6 Jun 2006 09:46:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 31796 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Jun 2006 09:46:25 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.s.netic.de (HELO mail.s.netic.de) (212.9.160.11) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jun 2006 09:45:52 +0000 Received: from host-213-178-187-20.dsl.netic.de ([213.178.187.20] helo=schleim.qwe.de) by mail.s.netic.de with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1FnY86-000084-5e; Tue, 06 Jun 2006 11:45:42 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by schleim.qwe.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 631C43AC6F; Tue, 6 Jun 2006 11:49:34 +0200 (CEST) From: Torsten Mohr To: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: V850E simulator, assembler single-step never returns?!? Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 09:46:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz , Keith Seitz References: <200606052145.25672.tmohr@s.netic.de> <200606060036.09212.tmohr@s.netic.de> <20060605224119.GB4384@nevyn.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20060605224119.GB4384@nevyn.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200606061149.33952.tmohr@s.netic.de> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-06/txt/msg00038.txt.bz2 Hi, > > i just single-stepped in the console (si). It shows the same result > > plus: > > The last line in the console i see is: > > [not visible]../../../../newlib-1.14.0/newlib/libc/stdlib/mlock.c:51 > > I attached the part from mlock.c below with line 51 marked. > > Though i don't think it can be related to that, as in the assembler > > this line just results to "jmp [lp]", also when i look at it in > > gdb console with "l *0x11f4". > > In this case, it is probably a bug in the simulator. so how to proceed from here? Do i need to report that somewhere? Should somebody else try to reproduce that behaviour? Can i give some more information or make some more tests? Best regards, Torsten.