From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9725 invoked by alias); 31 May 2006 12:49:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 9716 invoked by uid 22791); 31 May 2006 12:49:27 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from eastrmmtao01.cox.net (HELO eastrmmtao01.cox.net) (68.230.240.38) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 31 May 2006 12:49:26 +0000 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([68.9.66.48]) by eastrmmtao01.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20060531124923.XQUV17255.eastrmmtao01.cox.net@localhost.localdomain>; Wed, 31 May 2006 08:49:23 -0400 Received: from bob by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52) id 1FlQ8b-00063v-6c; Wed, 31 May 2006 08:49:25 -0400 Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 13:27:00 -0000 From: Bob Rossi To: Jim Ingham , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: MI query questions Message-ID: <20060531124924.GB29425@brasko.net> Mail-Followup-To: Jim Ingham , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <20060530175310.GD31100@brasko.net> <20060530181143.GE31100@brasko.net> <6FE49E5C-CD1C-45FC-B2FF-97E4B2FFA779@apple.com> <20060530185446.GF31100@brasko.net> <6CF6F2BF-276F-4634-BA75-80698EEE64EE@apple.com> <20060530204553.GA23684@nevyn.them.org> <7D653D4A-A9FE-4B53-A6CB-3464235216CF@apple.com> <20060530211455.GA24852@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060530211455.GA24852@nevyn.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-05/txt/msg00411.txt.bz2 On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 05:14:55PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 02:10:46PM -0700, Jim Ingham wrote: > > >(B) It makes parsing the output somewhat trickier. > > > > > >Would it be helpful to have some general solution for this, presumably > > >involving completions (i.e. closures)? Come back and answer the > > >prompt > > >when you're ready? > > > > This would probably be nicer, though I'm not sure it's worth the > > effort unless there are other places where we can forsee using this > > beyond -interpreter-exec. > > You're right - this is probably the only one. Hmm, I'm sorry to be the one that doesn't understand whats being said here. Could someone spell this out for me in simple terms? Thanks, Bob Rossi