From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23304 invoked by alias); 19 May 2006 22:07:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 23294 invoked by uid 22791); 19 May 2006 22:07:40 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 May 2006 22:07:38 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1FhD89-0004GV-Cu; Fri, 19 May 2006 18:07:33 -0400 Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 00:18:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Mark Kettenis Cc: joseph@codesourcery.com, qpan@mvista.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: GDB 6.5 release process created Message-ID: <20060519220733.GB16297@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Mark Kettenis , joseph@codesourcery.com, qpan@mvista.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <20060516213808.6F8981B4BC@hermes.mvista.com> <20060518172943.1F3D11B3F4@hermes.mvista.com> <20060519030011.GB24596@nevyn.them.org> <200605192113.k4JLDYdH001365@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200605192113.k4JLDYdH001365@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-05/txt/msg00323.txt.bz2 On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 11:13:34PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 10:25:24 +0000 (UTC) > > From: "Joseph S. Myers" > > > > On Thu, 18 May 2006, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > > > > On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 10:29:44AM -0700, Qunying Pan wrote: > > > > Hello: > > > > > > > > I noticed the gdb/configure file in this prerelease was generated by > > > > autoconf 2.59d instead of autoconf 2.59. Should we fix it before release or > > > > we are going to go with autoconf 2.59d? > > > > > > Do you think it makes a major difference? I hope it won't. > > > > It changes the default infodir and mandir (to follow a more recent version > > of the GNU Coding Standards), so if different subdirectories use different > > versions then different subdirectories may install documentation in > > different places. > > Then I think we should stick to 2.59, until the next official autoconf > release is out. Yes, I agree. I didn't notice the problem even when I tested packaging, because the new defaults (/usr/share/info and /usr/share/doc) are what I've been configuring GDB to use for ages. The current version is my fault; Debian/unstable upgraded to 2.59d. Could someone else please regenerate it for me? At some point I'll have to get a local installation of it together, but not tonight. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery