From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19579 invoked by alias); 19 May 2006 01:19:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 19571 invoked by uid 22791); 19 May 2006 01:19:16 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from eastrmmtao05.cox.net (HELO eastrmmtao05.cox.net) (68.230.240.34) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 May 2006 01:19:14 +0000 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([68.9.66.48]) by eastrmmtao05.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20060519011912.INHK26910.eastrmmtao05.cox.net@localhost.localdomain>; Thu, 18 May 2006 21:19:12 -0400 Received: from bob by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52) id 1Fgte8-0000bA-9R; Thu, 18 May 2006 21:19:16 -0400 Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 02:31:00 -0000 From: Bob Rossi To: teawater Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: GDB remote user interface 0.0.0 release Message-ID: <20060519011916.GA31982@brasko.net> References: <20060518162503.GC21003@brasko.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-05/txt/msg00294.txt.bz2 On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 09:17:08AM +0800, teawater wrote: > I wrote an entirely new protocol. Like Daniel asked, why would you do that? What's wrong with gdb/mi? Does it some how not fit your needs? Thanks, Bob Rossi