From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27320 invoked by alias); 17 May 2006 05:15:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 27300 invoked by uid 22791); 17 May 2006 05:15:31 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nile.gnat.com (HELO nile.gnat.com) (205.232.38.5) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 May 2006 05:15:29 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FCF248CC4C; Wed, 17 May 2006 01:15:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nile.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nile.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 18885-01; Wed, 17 May 2006 01:15:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from takamaka.act-europe.fr (s142-179-108-108.bc.hsia.telus.net [142.179.108.108]) by nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37D4248CC43; Wed, 17 May 2006 01:15:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 507) id EA22947E7F; Tue, 16 May 2006 22:15:25 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 16:33:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: "David S. Miller" Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: GDB 6.5 branch open for patches ! Message-ID: <20060517051525.GD12531@adacore.com> References: <20060516202443.GC12531@adacore.com> <20060516.170117.113545389.davem@davemloft.net> <20060516.170807.54917270.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060516.170807.54917270.davem@davemloft.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-05/txt/msg00261.txt.bz2 > Actually... something is up with the test tarball. > > In the test tarball from the FTP site, the file > gdb-6.4.0.20060516/gdb/sparc-linux-nat.c only contains the function > "_initialize_sparc_linux_nat ()", whereas in the gdb-6.5 branch that > file also contains the necessary supply_gregset() et al. that should > be. > > Perhaps the 6.5 branch snapshot FTP url was incorrect or it contains > the wrong sources :-) Let's see how it goes with tomorrow's sources. I think the snapshot you tried was from the 6.4 branch, since I just updated the nightly script that does the source packaging. I'll double-check everything tomorrow. -- Joel