From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8054 invoked by alias); 17 May 2006 00:08:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 8046 invoked by uid 22791); 17 May 2006 00:08:08 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from dsl027-180-168.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO sunset.davemloft.net) (216.27.180.168) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 May 2006 00:08:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] ident=davem) by sunset.davemloft.net with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Fg9aG-0004aq-M4; Tue, 16 May 2006 17:08:12 -0700 Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 00:32:00 -0000 Message-Id: <20060516.170807.54917270.davem@davemloft.net> To: brobecker@adacore.com Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: GDB 6.5 branch open for patches ! From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <20060516.170117.113545389.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20060516202443.GC12531@adacore.com> <20060516.170117.113545389.davem@davemloft.net> X-Mailer: Mew version 4.2.53 on Emacs 21.4 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-05/txt/msg00256.txt.bz2 From: "David S. Miller" Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 17:01:17 -0700 (PDT) > From: Joel Brobecker > Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 13:24:43 -0700 > > > Just a quick note to confirm that the gdb-6.5 branch is now open > > for patches. We also gratefully accept build reports and/or > > testsuite reports. > > Some recent change broke thread debugging on Linux/Sparc, I'll try > to figure out where this regression came from. Actually... something is up with the test tarball. In the test tarball from the FTP site, the file gdb-6.4.0.20060516/gdb/sparc-linux-nat.c only contains the function "_initialize_sparc_linux_nat ()", whereas in the gdb-6.5 branch that file also contains the necessary supply_gregset() et al. that should be. Perhaps the 6.5 branch snapshot FTP url was incorrect or it contains the wrong sources :-)