From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24597 invoked by alias); 11 May 2006 02:26:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 24581 invoked by uid 22791); 11 May 2006 02:26:15 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from eastrmmtao04.cox.net (HELO eastrmmtao04.cox.net) (68.230.240.35) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 May 2006 02:26:13 +0000 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([68.9.66.48]) by eastrmmtao04.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20060511022611.HUKQ9931.eastrmmtao04.cox.net@localhost.localdomain> for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 22:26:11 -0400 Received: from bob by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52) id 1Fe0t8-0004b0-NG for gdb@sources.redhat.com; Wed, 10 May 2006 22:26:50 -0400 Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 03:39:00 -0000 From: Bob Rossi To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: CLI commands in MI Message-ID: <20060511022650.GA3727@brasko.net> Mail-Followup-To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-05/txt/msg00118.txt.bz2 I'm thinking it would be a good idea to remove the ability to enter CLI commands into the MI interpreter. Does anyone disagree? I think the only thing it can cause is confusion. Especially since entering the '-exec-run' command gives different results than the '-interpreter-exec console "r"' command which gives different results than the 'r' command. Now that -interpreter-exec is available, is there any reason beyond trying to confuse us all that console commands are allowed? Thanks, Bob Rossi