From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17536 invoked by alias); 5 May 2006 15:02:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 17521 invoked by uid 22791); 5 May 2006 15:02:00 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 May 2006 15:01:59 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1Fc1oZ-0007bC-32 for gdb@sources.redhat.com; Fri, 05 May 2006 11:01:55 -0400 Date: Fri, 05 May 2006 15:02:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: -var-update and address changes Message-ID: <20060505150155.GA29174@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <200605031002.21910.ghost@cs.msu.su> <20060504145046.GA32605@nevyn.them.org> <200605051025.33901.ghost@cs.msu.su> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200605051025.33901.ghost@cs.msu.su> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-05/txt/msg00035.txt.bz2 On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 10:25:32AM +0400, Vladimir Prus wrote: > On Thursday 04 May 2006 18:50, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > The removed reinit_frame_cache is undoubtedly a performance suck. I > > see no reason it should be necessary. This code is still dubious; > > the select_frame call clobbers the selected frame and nothing ever > > restores it. > > I believe that it's saved/restored in varobj_update. Ah, you are correct. Thanks. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery