From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22186 invoked by alias); 26 Apr 2006 18:17:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 22176 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Apr 2006 18:17:34 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Apr 2006 18:17:32 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1FYoZt-00073a-Vt; Wed, 26 Apr 2006 14:17:30 -0400 Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 18:00:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: PAUL GILLIAM Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: watchpoints and threads Message-ID: <20060426181729.GA27105@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: PAUL GILLIAM , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <1146074582.18934.79.camel@dufur.beaverton.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1146074582.18934.79.camel@dufur.beaverton.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-04/txt/msg00323.txt.bz2 On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 11:03:02AM -0700, PAUL GILLIAM wrote: > The manual seems to say that this scenario will not work, but the > testcase seems to say that it will. > > What's the story? The patches to implement this (for some limited set of architectures?) were approved but never committed, I believe. Like last January. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery