Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Vladimir Prus <ghost@cs.msu.su>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: MI: performance of getting stack arguments
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 18:17:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060426145938.GA21560@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e2o1hn$a4n$1@sea.gmane.org>

On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 06:53:43PM +0400, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> Here's the results I get for multiple -stack-list-frames commands:
> 
>  %   cumulative   self              self     total
>  time   seconds   seconds    calls  Ts/call  Ts/call  name
>  24.18      2.50     2.50                             find_pc_sect_psymbol
>  18.28      4.39     1.89                            
> lookup_minimal_symbol_by_pc_section
>   8.03      5.22     0.83                             find_pc_sect_psymtab
>   6.48      5.89     0.67                             find_pc_sect_section
>   4.06      6.31     0.42                             dwarf2_frame_find_fde
>   3.09      6.63     0.32                             find_pc_sect_line
>   2.03      6.84     0.21                             mem_file_write
>   1.84      7.03     0.19                             printchar
> 
> I'm not sure how to interpret this data, though.

I'd definitely try to get a callgraph - either from --enable-profiling
or callgrind, whatever.  It looks like we're doing a _lot_ of
unwinding; otherwise dwarf2_frame_find_fde shouldn't be showing up.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery


  reply	other threads:[~2006-04-26 14:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-04-18 16:40 Vladimir Prus
2006-04-18 16:45 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-04-18 21:15   ` Jim Ingham
2006-04-19  7:55   ` Vladimir Prus
2006-04-19 16:13     ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-04-20  8:50     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-04-26 14:10       ` Vladimir Prus
2006-04-26 14:59         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-04-26 18:02           ` Vladimir Prus
2006-04-26 18:17             ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2006-04-18 19:11 ` Jim Ingham
2006-04-18 21:35   ` Robert Dewar
2006-04-18 21:37     ` Jim Ingham
2006-04-19  6:08       ` Robert Dewar
2006-04-19  7:30         ` Vladimir Prus
2006-04-19  6:11       ` Nick Roberts
2006-04-19  8:45         ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-04-19  9:02           ` Nick Roberts
2006-04-19 12:40       ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-04-20 10:22         ` Jim Ingham
2006-04-19  6:20   ` Vladimir Prus
2006-04-19  8:28 ` Eli Zaretskii

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060426145938.GA21560@nevyn.them.org \
    --to=drow@false.org \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=ghost@cs.msu.su \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox