From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Vladimir Prus <ghost@cs.msu.su>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: MI: performance of getting stack arguments
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 18:17:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060426145938.GA21560@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e2o1hn$a4n$1@sea.gmane.org>
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 06:53:43PM +0400, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> Here's the results I get for multiple -stack-list-frames commands:
>
> % cumulative self self total
> time seconds seconds calls Ts/call Ts/call name
> 24.18 2.50 2.50 find_pc_sect_psymbol
> 18.28 4.39 1.89
> lookup_minimal_symbol_by_pc_section
> 8.03 5.22 0.83 find_pc_sect_psymtab
> 6.48 5.89 0.67 find_pc_sect_section
> 4.06 6.31 0.42 dwarf2_frame_find_fde
> 3.09 6.63 0.32 find_pc_sect_line
> 2.03 6.84 0.21 mem_file_write
> 1.84 7.03 0.19 printchar
>
> I'm not sure how to interpret this data, though.
I'd definitely try to get a callgraph - either from --enable-profiling
or callgrind, whatever. It looks like we're doing a _lot_ of
unwinding; otherwise dwarf2_frame_find_fde shouldn't be showing up.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-26 14:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-18 16:40 Vladimir Prus
2006-04-18 16:45 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-04-18 21:15 ` Jim Ingham
2006-04-19 7:55 ` Vladimir Prus
2006-04-19 16:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-04-20 8:50 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-04-26 14:10 ` Vladimir Prus
2006-04-26 14:59 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-04-26 18:02 ` Vladimir Prus
2006-04-26 18:17 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2006-04-18 19:11 ` Jim Ingham
2006-04-18 21:35 ` Robert Dewar
2006-04-18 21:37 ` Jim Ingham
2006-04-19 6:08 ` Robert Dewar
2006-04-19 7:30 ` Vladimir Prus
2006-04-19 6:11 ` Nick Roberts
2006-04-19 8:45 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-04-19 9:02 ` Nick Roberts
2006-04-19 12:40 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-04-20 10:22 ` Jim Ingham
2006-04-19 6:20 ` Vladimir Prus
2006-04-19 8:28 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060426145938.GA21560@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=ghost@cs.msu.su \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox