From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23392 invoked by alias); 26 Apr 2006 14:10:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 23375 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Apr 2006 14:10:10 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Apr 2006 14:10:05 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1FYkiQ-0005H0-Qr for gdb@sourceware.org; Wed, 26 Apr 2006 10:10:03 -0400 Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 14:59:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: MI: performance of getting stack arguments Message-ID: <20060426141002.GB20166@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb@sourceware.org References: <20060418161654.GA15524@nevyn.them.org> <200604191020.08044.ghost@cs.msu.su> <20060419124032.GA9524@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-04/txt/msg00319.txt.bz2 On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 06:06:26PM +0400, Vladimir Prus wrote: > Ok, I'll try to do this. First on -stack-list-arguments, since it's pretty > slow to. But, maybe I should be using callgrind (part of valgrind suite) > for profiling? I've had a lot of trouble getting the valgrind tools to play nice with GDB; they want to debug the children too and get confused by ptrace. But it looks like there've been some changes and now the default is not to do that, so maybe it'll work better. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery