From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9342 invoked by alias); 6 Apr 2006 15:49:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 9334 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Apr 2006 15:49:31 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp106.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com (HELO smtp106.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (68.142.198.205) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with SMTP; Thu, 06 Apr 2006 15:49:30 +0000 Received: (qmail 22704 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2006 15:49:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lucon.org) (hjjean@sbcglobal.net@75.0.171.244 with login) by smtp106.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 6 Apr 2006 15:49:28 -0000 Received: by lucon.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3A18E64034; Thu, 6 Apr 2006 08:49:27 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2006 15:56:00 -0000 From: "H. J. Lu" To: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Time for a new release? Message-ID: <20060406154926.GA11506@lucon.org> References: <20060315043747.GA695@adacore.com> <20060315170117.GA3806@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <20060317194104.GD19068@nevyn.them.org> <20060406150457.GA800@adacore.com> <20060406153218.GA28110@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060406153218.GA28110@nevyn.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-04/txt/msg00068.txt.bz2 On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 11:32:18AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 08:04:57AM -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote: > > [moving the discussion to gdb (from gdb-patches) as recommended] > > > > > > > Branch: Apr 3rd > > > > > Pre-release: Apr 5th > > > > > Release: Apr 19th > > > > > > Sounds reasonable to me. I know I have a lot of things coming up > > > that I don't want to sneak "under the wire" into a release - I'll > > > want to give them a lot of time to settle down. > > > > I have set some time aside to work on this today. Is Apr 3rd still > > OK for cutting the branch? > > i.e. three days ago? At this point, I'd recommend waiting a couple of > days; let's get David Miller's SPARC/Linux fixes in first. > > > Would one month be a good duration? I think this is what we did the > > last time. > > Yes, I think so. > > > OK. Will post a patch to disable -Werror by default. > > On the release branch, I hope you mean? How have we resolved "del 1"? It used to work. Now I have to use "delete 1". H.J.