From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: der.herr@hofr.at
Cc: gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: /gdb/regcache.c question
Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2006 12:44:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200604021244.k32CiRXZ029528@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200604030757.k337vhj22619@hofr.at> (message from Der Herr Hofrat on Mon, 3 Apr 2006 09:57:43 +0200 (CEST))
> From: Der Herr Hofrat <der.herr@hofr.at>
> Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 09:57:43 +0200 (CEST)
>
> Hi !
>
> while implementing tracepoints I ran acros a little problem with
> gdb/regcache.c - the behavior is not really an error its just overly
> strict for interactive input, obviously regache.c is assuming
> automatic generation of registers lists only.
>
> (gdb) actions
> Enter actions for tracepoint 1, one per line.
> End with a line saying just "end".
> > collect $regs
> > end
> (gdb) trace junk2
> Tracepoint 2 at 0x80483eb: file hello.c, line 27.
> (gdb) actions
> Enter actions for tracepoint 2, one per line.
> End with a line saying just "end".
> > collect $sp
> regcache.c:163: internal-error: register_type: Assertion `regnum >= 0 && regnum
> < descr->nr_cooked_registers' failed.
> A problem internal to GDB has been detected,
> further debugging may prove unreliable.
> Quit this debugging session? (y or n) n
>
> regcache.c:163: internal-error: register_type: Assertion `regnum >= 0 && regnum
> < descr->nr_cooked_registers' failed.
> A problem internal to GDB has been detected,
> further debugging may prove unreliable.
> Create a core file of GDB? (y or n) y
>
>
> The trigger is gdb_assert in line 163:
>
> gdb/regcache.c:159-165
> struct type *
> register_type (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, int regnum)
> {
> struct regcache_descr *descr = regcache_descr (gdbarch);
> gdb_assert (regnum >= 0 && regnum < descr->nr_cooked_registers);
> return descr->register_type[regnum];
> }
>
>
> So a simple misstyp of the register name runs into an assertion
> with a core file dumped - this makes sense for automatic generation
> - but for tracepoints you need to manually be able to pass
> registers with collect $REGNAME , and for that case gdb_assert ->
> corfile is a little harsh on the user.
I don't understand what you're doing here, but that gdb_assert (and
all gdb_asserts in the code) is checking for a "should not happen"
condition. If you hit one, it means there's a bug in some other piece
of gdb code. You should find and fix that bug.
Mark
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-02 12:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-02 7:45 Der Herr Hofrat
2006-04-02 12:44 ` Mark Kettenis [this message]
2006-04-02 13:37 ` Der Herr Hofrat
2006-04-02 13:49 ` Mark Kettenis
2006-04-02 16:33 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200604021244.k32CiRXZ029528@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl \
--to=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
--cc=der.herr@hofr.at \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox