From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23820 invoked by alias); 15 Mar 2006 14:22:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 23811 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Mar 2006 14:22:34 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Mar 2006 14:22:33 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1FJWtT-0003GY-5b; Wed, 15 Mar 2006 09:22:31 -0500 Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 14:23:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Ed Peschko Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: tracing, attaching to gdb processes Message-ID: <20060315142230.GA12258@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Ed Peschko , gdb@sourceware.org References: <20060306052832.GA12829@mdssdev05> <20060314022809.GA1335@nevyn.them.org> <20060315030437.GE10146@mdssdev05> <20060315034420.GA1616@nevyn.them.org> <20060315041618.GB12493@mdssdev05> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060315041618.GB12493@mdssdev05> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-03/txt/msg00075.txt.bz2 On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 08:16:18PM -0800, Ed Peschko wrote: > Also, I note that when you do do something like this, you get a 'press to > coninue, q to quit'. It would be nice if there was a way to override this. "set height 0" Stopping on input is a bit more complicated than you think. Whenever the program is running, it has control of the terminal - and input goes to it, not to us. I don't see an easy way to do this. > well, cool.. then simply add that as a hook inside the library. Which would > you rather write (continuously), the first one, or the second? And isn't it useful > to have it just for suggesting ideas to end users of gdb? That says to me that it belongs in the manual. Shipping a library is a serious pain; why should we do it for a two-line function? > Anyways, if this isn't the place to request gdb features, what *is* the correct > place? It's the right place; I'm just not sure I agree with your suggestions. If someone else does, they're welcome to submit a patch :-) -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery