From: Ed Peschko <esp5@pge.com>
To: Dave Korn <dave.korn@artimi.com>
Cc: "'Bob Rossi'" <bob@brasko.net>, gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: tracing, attaching to gdb processes
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2006 20:10:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060306201012.GA14453@mdssdev05> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <055601c64115$a2b494a0$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 12:01:00PM -0000, Dave Korn wrote:
> On 06 March 2006 11:55, Bob Rossi wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 09:28:32PM -0800, Ed Peschko wrote:
> >> all,
> >>
> >> I had a couple of suggestions for gdb, and was wondering if they had either
> >> been implemented, or were on the 'wish list' to be implemented.
> >>
> >>
> >> 2) attach mode. I've noticed, especially with testing services through
> >> xinetd, that you can't always expect to have a gdb session come up
> >> visibly.
> >>
> >> For example, I was testing cvs the other day through valgrind, and
> >> it has a --db-command option for firing up a debugger if a memory
> >> leak occurs. If you are in a shell, this is no big deal. But if the
> >> service runs through something like valgrind, the gdb debugger gets
> >> fired up in a non-interactive place. I'd like to have the ability
> >> to attach to the gdb command from a window and be able to interact
> >> with the gdb session from there.
> >
> > For this problem, couldn't you simply have valgrind either start GDB in
> > screen so that you could attach to it when you want, or use a graphical
> > debugger (xterm -e gdb)?
> >
> > Bob Rossi
>
> Or have valgrind attach a gdbserver instance to the faulting process, and
> then connect locally to _that_ with gdb?
>
> cheers,
> DaveK
> --
well, the X11 solution was the one I thought of first, but I don't always have a X11
connection (I do most of my stuff over screen), and two, since valgrind is run under
inetd, its not in an interactive terminal, so I would be very interested to know
if I *could* redirect the gdb session to a screen, and if so, how.
WRT gdbserver, I'm not sure - I need to start the gdb with the format
gdb -nw %f %p,
ie: be able to write to the executable or core file, and to be able to attach to the
process. I guess I also need to stop the gdbserver each time I do this, the gdb through
valgrind is a blocking call..
Anyways, thanks for the suggestions. I'm assuming that the 'trace' mode, on the other
hand does not exist?
Ed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-06 20:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-06 5:28 Ed Peschko
2006-03-06 11:55 ` Bob Rossi
2006-03-06 12:01 ` Dave Korn
2006-03-06 20:10 ` Ed Peschko [this message]
2006-03-14 2:28 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-03-15 3:44 ` Ed Peschko
2006-03-15 3:45 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-03-15 5:09 ` Ed Peschko
2006-03-15 14:23 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-03-15 23:37 ` Ed Peschko
2006-03-16 0:53 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-03-16 3:08 ` Ed Peschko
2006-03-16 7:04 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060306201012.GA14453@mdssdev05 \
--to=esp5@pge.com \
--cc=bob@brasko.net \
--cc=dave.korn@artimi.com \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox